BVS Banner

Posts Tagged ‘Web Design’

Do’s and Dont’s in web site building

Sunday, October 4th, 2009

No matter how attractive a site’s design, if it isn’t practical, it’s not doing its job. Design for the screen involves a new set of requirements to deal with and pitfalls to avoid.

1

Keep graphics files small. Cyberspace has the unique distinction of being the first medium where you can actually bore your readers by being too exciting.

Design for the World Wide Web is a balancing act between the graphic “wow” and the real-time “now.” The more graphically intense a site, the longer it can take to download. The longer it takes, the higher the probability that the visitor will leave before it’s done.

On intranets, smaller file sizes can help make the system run faster with less overhead. Performance means productivity.

While modems are getting faster, most people on the Web are still connected at 28.8–and even then the Web doesn’t always run at top speed.

With a 28.8k connection, your computer can receive, on average, 2K per second.

No one wants to wait even 30 seconds just to see your site logo–if your graphics are too large people will turn them off or jump to another site. If possible, keep all graphics under 20K. Essential graphics for navigation should be less than 10K. You can do this using reduced color palettes, such as a carefully selected 4-bit palette instead of the full 8-bit palette. In some cases this can reduce graphics in half.

For the most efficient files, you must use the right file type. Here’s the simple rule for deciding which format to choose:

  • If your graphics have many colors, save them as JPG files.
  • If your graphics have few colors, choose GIF.
  • When using GIF, try optimized palettes that contain only the colors used—they can cut file sizes in half.

Use only the resolution you need. Computer screen displays have an average resolution of 96 dpi (dots per inch) for Windows, 72 dpi for the Mac. This means your graphics should be saved at a resolution not greater than 96 dpi—otherwise you’re just wasting your readers’ time.

Here are some Web-centric graphic programs that can help reduce your graphics:

Programs to use by themselves:

    CorelXara – This exceptional Windows-based illustration program comes complete with everything you need to create the smoothest, yet most efficient, Web graphics and animations. The program is lightning fast, extremely powerful, yet features a clean, simple interface that makes it great for new users, and design power and flexibility that’s great for professionals. Graphic previews of all exports help you create the best-looking, fastest-loading Web graphics. Under $100, Windows only.Macromedia FireWorks -  A professional-strength illustration program designed specifically for web graphics. Special effects let you enhance text and graphics. Previews help you create the most efficient graphics.

Programs to use in conjunction
with other graphics programs:

    Adobe ImageStyler and ImageReady – These programs are for professionals who already use graphics programs such as Illustrator or Photoshop. Their Web-specific features include animation and export previews. The interface will be familiar to Adobe users but may be overwhelming to newer users. Windows and Mac.Debabblizer – This comprehensive graphics tool helps you optimize Web graphics, reduce palettes and therefore file sizes, and perform batch conversions to and from countless graphics file formats. Windows and Mac.Ulead SmartSaver – Find the best balance between image quality and size using this utility. Windows only.Autofx Webvise totality – This Photoshop-compatible plug-in lets you preview Web exports so you can create the most efficient files for the Web. Windows and Mac.

2

Keep text files small. Text files rarely need to be longer than 10K. Instead, they should be broken into logical chunks and linked. If a home page doesn’t load quickly, visitors can lose interest and jump else

where.


3

Design for easy reading. Don’t trade readability for style. Make your backgrounds as light as possible (white or pastels—just make sure they use “Web-safe” nondithered colors). If you use a background image, keep the action on the side, out of the way of the text, or make it very light, low contrast, and nondithered. Use black backgrounds only on pages with large text, such as headings, then switch to dark text on a light background for pages with “normal” size text.

Because most computer screens are wider than they are tall, and good typography for the best readability demands shorter line lengths (between 30 and 70 characters per line), it makes sense to put navigation on the left (or right) side of the screen. This layout is becoming increasingly popular because it’s practical and allows the site to reserve part of the screen (usually between 150 and 200 pixels) for navigation and identity. Use fixed-width tables to assure that lines don’t get too long—no matter the viewer’s resolution or window-size.


4

Design for 256 colors (8-bit) and 640×480 resolution. That’s the lowest common-denominator for people with older computers. Many people viewing the Web can only see 256 colors at a time on their computer screen, so creating 24-bit photo-realistic files is usually overkill. Create and view your Web site at 640×480 because that’s the screen resolution many of your readers will use.

That said, this is changing. As more people get newer computers, they can see more colors (thousands to millions) and higher resolution. Current statistics say that only about 11% of site visitors have only 640×480 resolution, and only 8% have only 256 colors. That number is also decreasing by about 1% every three months.

That said, it’s still a good idea to design your entire page for 800×600, but keep the text portion of your site within 640×480. That way you get the best of both worlds. People with older computers will still be able to read your content, even if some parts of the page require scrolling.

Also, as LCD display prices drop, more people will buy them. Many LCD displays can “pivot” to show the screen in portrait mode (more like a normal piece of paper). In that mode, the displays show 768 wide by 1024 tall, so designing for 800 wide is too wide. So still don’t design for 800 wide, design for around 740 wide.

(more…)

VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Share/Save

The Big CSS3 Validation Debate

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009

Over the past few weeks I’ve received a number of emails from visitors to CSS3.info regarding CSS3 validation errors when using vendor specific extentions, for example -moz, -webkit, to implement CSS3 in their websites.

This certainly isn’t a new topic, and in fact Joost de Valke first raised the issue on this website back in January 2007, however a glance over the W3C mailing-list archive highlights that this debate is still going strong, with a number of interesting ideas raised, and I thought it would make an interesting discussion point for the CSS3.info community.

The problem is that, at present, none of the CSS3 modules have yet receached the status of becoming an official W3C Recommendation, as such any of these specifications could in theory be changed at time, particularly those that are still in the early stage of development.

Obviously browser vendors (with the exception of course of our beloved friend Microsoft) are keen to support these up and coming CSS3 specifications, however as they are still at an “experimental” stage of development it is necessary for the various css3 properties to be implemented using vendor specific extensions in order to avoid any possible conflicts with current or future css specifications.

(more…)

VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Share/Save

6 New Web Technologies of 2009 You Need to Use Now

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009

Every year, we see scores of innovations trickle onto the web — everything from new browser features to cool web apps to entire programming languages. Some of these concepts just make us smile, then we move on. Some completely blow our minds with their utility and ingenuity — and become must-haves.

For this list, we’ve compiled the most truly life-altering nuggets of brilliance to hit center stage in 2008: the ideas, products and enhancements to the web experience so huge that they make us wonder how we got along without them.

Nitpickers will notice that a couple of these technologies arrived two or three years ago. Others aren’t even fully baked yet. But each innovation on our list reached a level of maturity, hit the point of critical mass, or stepped in to fill a burning need during 2008 that resulted in it significantly changing the landscape of the web.

Here’s to the technologies currently making the web a better place than it was 12 months ago.

(more…)

VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Share/Save

The Beauty of CSS

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

CSS is not a difficult language to learn, though there are bugs and browser discrepancies to deal with. He wrote off CSS when he compared IE5/Mac layouts in Netscape 4, but regained religion in 2002.

What about CSS is so beautiful to him?

“Standards” are “widely recognized” and “regularly used.” “Standards give us some kind of consistent target to build toward.” Standards benefit those who build the tools and build with the tools.

In nature, beauty goes beyond the surface down to structure and up to ecosystems. You often get accessibility bundled with CSS as a package deal.

Feedback from Wired News reader, which he shares “by no means in a raconteur style”: If you ask for feedback after you redesign a site, 90% of the feedback will be negative. “Your colours are awful; they’re too bright. I can’t read your type. Your designer sucks and should be fired.” Positive feedback to his own site followed a little formula, including one message that ended with “By the way, I’m blind.” “And that hit me like a ton of bricks…. His message basically completely fundamentally changed the work I do…. I don’t just design for people who can appreciate the beautiful designs and type I use on a site. I also design for blind people. I also design for people who can’t get out of the house because of a mobility impairment.”

Advantages: “Fstr” (sic) in real or apparent speeds. Simpler code; greater flexibility; one version.

Mistakes? Boxiness: Overreliance on the box model and making the box visible. “This can be a symptom of starting with CSS too early” in the design process, doing “only what we can immediately remember in CSS.” Image replacement: “A year ago at South by Southwest I deprecated image replacement.” We already have a tag for that in HTML: img with alt. In fact, a lot of the success of CSS Zen Garden is image replacement. You can’t zoom into it, for example [though you can with sIFR – zoom then reload]. Presentational class and id names: large, redtext, top-line, borderred, rightcol. Use page-title, subhead, main, module, secondary instead. Accessibility assumptions: Just for the blind or PDA users. Imitation.

VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Share/Save

960 Gridder: Easy to use layout design tool

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

Andrée Hansson has created 960 Gridder, a grid layout tool for web developers that you can either use as an integrated component to layout your websites or use it as a bookmarklet. The grid is fully customizable but it defaults to the “960px grid standard”.

960 Gridder will automatically identify if jQuery is present at the website and if it is not, it will include it.

It injects your website of choice and you can then work with this tool to help you out with whichever layout/design task you find it useful for.

By default, it is set to work with 12 columns, 60 pixel wide columns with a 10 pixel spacer left and right of the column, making it a 20 pixel wide gutter (which actually is the ones this gridder renders).

You can see and read about the “960 standard” at http://960.gs.

VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.8_1072]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Share/Save
Freelance Web Developers | Entries (RSS) | and Comments (RSS)